Because of an incredibly large amount of spam signups, open registration is now closed.
Send me an e-mail to [email protected] if you would like to become a contributor to Fade To Blog.
--Drew The Geek / Resident Webmaster--
Fade To Blog – Fade To Blog
LAFORGE: There she is. She's beautiful. ...All right. Take a look.
COCHRANE: Well, well, well. What have we got here? ...I love a good peep show.
(Cochrane looks through a telescope and sees the Enterprise orbiting)
COCHRANE: Ha, ha, ha. That's a trick. Ha, ha, ha. How'd you do that?
LAFORGE: It's your telescope.
TROI: That's our ship. The Enterprise.
COCHRANE: And Lily's up there right now?
TROI (OC): That's right.
COCHRANE: Can I talk to her?
RIKER: We've lost contact with the Enterprise. We don't know why yet.
COCHRANE: So, what is it you want me to do?
RIKER: Simple. Conduct your warp flight tomorrow morning just as you planned.
COCHRANE: Why tomorrow morning?
RIKER: Because at eleven o'clock an alien ship will begin passing through this solar system.
COCHRANE: Alien? You mean extra-terrestrials. More bad guys?
TROI: Good guys. They're on a survey mission. They have no interest in Earth. ...Too primitive.
RIKER: Doctor, tomorrow morning when they detect the warp signature from your ship and realize that humans have discovered how to travel faster than light, they decide to alter their course and make first contact with Earth, right here.
LAFORGE: Sir, it's actually over there.
RIKER: It is one of the pivotal moments in human history, Doctor. You get to make first contact with an alien race, and after you do, everything begins to change.
LAFORGE: Your theories on warp drive allow fleets of starships to be built and mankind to start exploring the Galaxy.
TROI: It unites humanity in a way no one ever thought possible when they realize they're not alone in the universe. Poverty, disease, war. They'll all be gone within the next fifty years.
RIKER: But unless you make that warp flight tomorrow morning before eleven fifteen, none of it will happen.
COCHRANE: And you people, you're all astronauts, ... on some kind of star trek?
LAFORGE: Look, Doc, I know this is a lot for you to take in, but we're running out of time here.
RIKER: We need your help. ...What do you say?
COCHRANE: Why not?
This is why I LOVE Star Trek. It is a symbol of all that would-could/can-will be for the human race. What better thing to do on all-hallows-eve than to binge watch Star Trek movies?? In the movie 'First Contact' I was utterly galvanized when Troi says: "It unites humanity in a way no one ever thought possible when they realize they're not alone in the universe. Poverty, disease, war. They'll all be gone within the next fifty years." I got that energy explosion in the pit of my stomach and my jaw dropped because that is exactly where we are right now. Should the tech I ranted about in my last article be released, in 50 years we will have solved the world's problems and we will be that galactic race, finally.
I found the entire movie prophetic - in the fight against the Borg being a metaphor for the fight coming against transhumanism, an example of the right use of technology in the way the federation used it, in the stand a righteous man must make against a seemingly stronger force (Borg) to the extent of sacrificing his life for a moral philosophy, as we must all be ready to do, because the Borg symbolize the deepstate/cabal/elite/invasion force we are as a planet pitted against at this moment. We are at that tipping point. Really.
For over 40 years I have dreamt a secret dream that one day all that you see in Star Trek will become us. That the show was my perfect blue print for the future. And millions of people have agreed with me. There is no better structured creative dream out there for our future. As I have said before, give us a bone and we will worry it until we bring it to fruition, and this particular dream has the biggest, staunchest following of any creation that I personally know of. It is the most profoundly prophetic creation we have ever made.
It gives me hope for the future.
I was listening to the Jimmy Church Radio Show last night with guest Richard Dolan. I followed Richard's chat, and I was on twitter. During the commercial breaks I listened to Richard Dolan's conversation with his chat.
Richard Dolan is an academic, an established debater, historian and knows the rules of proper conduct in a conversation/debate. He is also a very ethical man and will not overstep the guidelines for elucidation of an idea because he knows that it's extremely unproductive.
For those who do not know:
Posted by Nullus Maximus
A significant amount of my recent work has been written in response to arguments made by other libertarian thinkers. As such, the time is ripe for a guide to how this is best done. This article will take the reader through the process of an exchange of ideas from start to finish, and explain my ten simple rules for debating. Those who follow these rules are guaranteed to become more successful debaters, as well as less stressed and overworked.
- Pick your battles. While a person of little renown may have enough time to engage with whomever one pleases at whatever length one desires, people who have less time to spend engaging in debates must choose which opponents to engage and which to ignore, as well as how long to engage each opponent. It is best to have a consistent rubric for this, which will be discussed further in rules 2 and 9.
- Engage only those worthy of being engaged. Some people are capable of maintaining a rational discourse, while other people cannot seem to communicate without resorting to personal attacks, profanity, threats, and other such uncivil behavior. Some people have interesting and novel insights, while other people insist upon bringing up points which have been refuted a thousand times. Some people are experts in the fields of which they speak, while other people do not stick to their lasts. Some people make the effort to properly support an argument, while other people Gish gallop. A person’s behavior in this regard is a strong indicator of whether that person is worthy of one’s attention. Note that other debaters will judge you by a similar standard, so be the kind of person that someone else would be willing to debate.
- Do your research. If you know a topic in great detail, you will be more able to counter any argument your opponent may make. An uninformed debater is an incompetent debater. An unprepared debater is a sloppy debater. Also, make sure that the sources you study are reliable. If the opponent is competent, a misinformed debater will be an embarrassed debater.
- Do not argue to convince the opponent; argue to convince a third party. In many cases, a person worthy of being engaged will be firmly entrenched in a position, and it may even be against the nature of the format for your opponent to come over to your side. Focus instead on convincing the audience, whether they be people watching a live debate or reading a correspondence. This methodology is stated explicitly in some debate formats, but it is sound strategy regardless.
- Base your arguments upon logic (logos), not emotion (pathos) or authority (ethos). A debate is properly won by using reason and evidence to demonstrate that one’s position is superior to that of one’s opponent. Detouring into appeals to emotion can help one connect with the audience or provoke an opponent into a misstep, but this does not advance one’s case in a rigorous manner. Appealing to the authority of oneself or someone else can dissuade a weak opponent or convince a less intelligent audience, but attempting this against a strong opponent in front of a knowledgeable audience is a recipe for disaster.
- Relentlessly attack logical fallacies and weak arguments. It is important to point out every shortcoming that you can find in your opponent’s case. Doing so will make you more skilled in identifying logical fallacies and weak arguments, which means that opponents will be less able to get away with sloppy reasoning in future debates. Do not worry about being pedantic; your job is to find all weaknesses in your opponent’s case and illuminate them to make your case appear stronger by comparison.
- Focus on the task at hand. A debate can easily go off track, especially if the subject matter is wide, deep, or both. Avoid making arguments that neither support your case nor attack your opponent’s case. Only go into the weeds if your opponent takes you there; the person who begins the foray into many different minutiae is usually running out of solid logic and evidence.
- Destroy arguments, not people. Be respectful of your opponent, or at least be as respectful of your opponent as he or she is of you. Resorting to personal attacks (or escalating them if they are already in use) is a refuge of a person with weak arguments, and it will make people less willing to consider your case on its merits. Remember, your job is to defeat your opponent’s arguments, not his or her character.
- Know when to quit. There comes a point in every debate at which further discussion has diminishing returns or even becomes completely pointless. It is important to learn to identify that point and stop there. Sometimes this will be clear; an opponent may even announce that a particular round will be his or her closing argument. If this happens, respond with a closing argument of your own and be finished; do not repeatedly pummel the opponent after he or she has left the debate. This may also be the case in a timed or response-limited debate, in which case one should abide by the rules of the format. In other cases, it will be a matter of personal judgment to decide to walk away from a debate.
- Handle both defeat and victory appropriately. No one likes a sore loser or a bad winner. If you lose a debate, reflect on how and why you lost. Then, take the necessary steps to avoid losing in the same manner in a future debate. This may involve more study of the debate topic, reviewing logical fallacies, or even changing one’s position on an issue. If you win, do not gloat or boast. Accept victory graciously, then check your discourse for arguments that could have been stronger or presented more effectively. From <https://www.zerothposition.com/2016/04/21/ten-simple-rules-for-debating/> (Italic emphasis mine)
Jimmy Church is a radio host. What we were listening to last night was a radio show. Not a court of law. Jimmy has said this many times on his show, he will interview anybody. He will give them as much rope as they want. His job is to make the guest comfortable and elicit the conversation, while asking the questions that everybody wants answers to, and that is a gift he brings to the show. It is not, nor has it ever been, nor can I conceive that it ever will be a court of law or a place where emotional bashing will ever be allowed to occur! I have heard him politely hang up on people who try to take the conversation there. Those are his ethics. He will not step beyond them, just as Richard Dolan will not.
What just makes my jaw drop is the preponderance of loud noise people can make when they do not know about critical thinking or debate. The loudest voice never wins, nor does the meanest. Period. There was so much verbal battery going on in the comments last night that I was floored. What has happened to everybody's minds???
It was not the purpose of either person speaking to provide evidence of any kind. This wasn't even a debate, it was a conversation. It certainly wasn't a court of law…
In a court of law:
Evidentiary Standards and Burdens of Proof
In almost every legal proceeding, the parties are required to adhere to important rules known as evidentiary standards and burdens of proof. These rules determine which party is responsible for putting forth enough evidence to either prove or defeat a particular claim and the amount of evidence necessary to accomplish that goal.
The Burden of Proof
The burden of proof determines which party is responsible for putting forth evidence and the level of evidence they must provide in order to prevail on their claim. In most cases, the plaintiff (the party bringing the claim) has the burden of proof.
The burden of proof has two components. First, the plaintiff must satisfy the burden of production, which has also been referred to as the burden of going forward. As the terms suggest, this burden requires the plaintiff to put forth evidence in the form of witness testimony, documents, or objects. After the plaintiff presents his or her case-in-chief, the burden of production shifts to the defendant, who then has the opportunity to provide evidence either rebutting the plaintiff’s evidence or supporting the defendant’s own arguments.
Evidentiary Standards in Civil Cases
Preponderance of the Evidence
Second, the plaintiff must satisfy the burden of persuasion. This burden determines which standard of proof the plaintiff must follow in presenting evidence to the judge or jury. A standard of proof determines the amount of evidence the plaintiff or defendant needs to provide in order for the jury to reach a particular determination. In most civil cases, the burden of persuasion that applies is called “a preponderance of the evidence.” This standard requires the jury to return a judgment in favor of the plaintiff if the plaintiff is able to show that a particular fact or event was more likely than not to have occurred. Some scholars define the preponderance of the evidence standard as requiring a finding that at least 51 percent of the evidence favors the plaintiff’s outcome.
Clear and Convincing Evidence
In some civil cases, the burden of proof is elevated to a higher standard called “clear and convincing evidence.” This burden of proof requires the plaintiff to prove that a particular fact is substantially more likely than not to be true. Some courts have described this standard as requiring the plaintiff to prove that there is a high probability that a particular fact is true. This standard sets a higher threshold than the preponderance of the evidence standard, but it does not quite rise to the widely recognized standard used in criminal cases, known as “beyond a reasonable doubt.”
In administrative law proceedings, the standard of proof that most commonly applies is the substantial evidence standard. This standard requires the plaintiff or moving party to provide enough evidence that a reasonable mind could accept as adequate to support a particular conclusion.
Evidentiary Standards in Criminal Cases
Beyond a Reasonable Doubt
The “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard is the highest standard of proof that may be imposed upon a party at trial, and it is usually the standard used in criminal cases. This standard requires the prosecution to show that the only logical explanation that can be derived from the facts is that the defendant committed the alleged crime, and that no other logical explanation can be inferred or deduced from the evidence. The United States Supreme Court in Victor v. Nebraska, 511 U.S. 1 (1994), described this standard as “such doubt as would give rise to a grave uncertainty, raised in your mind by reasons of the unsatisfactory character of the evidence or lack thereof . . . . What is required is not an absolute or mathematical certainty, but a moral certainty.”
Another common standard of proof used in some criminal law proceedings is the credible evidence standard. Credible evidence is evidence that is not necessarily true but that is worthy of belief and worthy of the jury’s consideration. Some have defined this standard as requiring the jury to conclude that the evidence is natural, reasonable, and probable in order for it to be credible.
Evidentiary Standards and Burdens of Proof Resources
Further, IMO (here it comes) when evidentiary standards and burden of proof are applied to the UFO question, we do not even know the scope of the situation. For instance, there is a preponderance of opinion out there that consciousness needs to added into the equation to properly understand what a reasonable question could/should be. From a quantum physics aspect looking at consciousness, this makes sense because of the 'observer effect' and entanglement. From an experiencer aspect it appears to be the whole of the experience from the preponderance of the data.
BEYOND UFOS: THE SCIENCE OF CONSCIOUSNESS AND CONTACT WITH NON HUMAN INTELLIGENCE (VOLUME ONE)
This 820 page book details the academic research findings of the world’s first comprehensive multi-language quantitative and qualitative 5 year academic research study on individuals that have had UFO related contact with Non-Human Intelligence (NHI)-- The FREE Experiencer Research Study.
Over the last 5 years FREE has collected detailed responses to 3 extensive quantitative and qualitative surveys from over 4,200 individuals from over 100 countries. Our survey findings from these thousands of "Experiencers" contradict much of what is circulating in mainstream materialist Ufology.
Our academic book will establish a new paradigm for viewing the UAP (UFO) Contact Phenomenon. FREE argues that "Consciousness" and the paranormal and psychic aspects of this phenomenon is the key to understanding this complex phenomenon instead of the traditional materialist perspective of "nuts & bolt's" Ufology.
The Dr. Edgar Mitchell Foundation for Research into Extraterrestrial and Extraordinary Experiences, or FREE, is a 501c3 Academic Research Not for Profit Foundation. FREE was co-founded by the late Apollo 14 astronaut Dr. Edgar Mitchell, Dr. Rudy Schild, an Emeritus Research Astronomer at the Harvard/Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics at Harvard University, Australian researcher Mary Rodwell and Rey Hernandez, an Attorney and Experiencer who was a Ph.D. Candidate at the University of California at Berkeley. FREE is comprised of retired academic professors and lay researchers who have been researching the field of Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon (UAP) and contact with Non-Human Intelligence (NHI) for more than 30 years. The Executive Director of FREE is Harvard Astrophysicist Dr. Rudy Schild. From <https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07G3JLS3H/ref=dp-kindle-redirect?_encoding=UTF8&btkr=1>
And this doesn't even scratch the surface of what needs to be added to the equation or quantified and debated. And yet - we descend into gossip and snarky attitudes over one little tiny insignificant piece of the puzzle and deem ourselves capable of not only presenting all the facts, but arguing them in a legal manner. This field is not about just one tiny little question, nor one tiny little person (or several) people. It is about the whole planet!
Wake up! Put your head on the right way and act like it's not empty in there!!!!! grrrrrrrrrrr
He did the best that he could with the highest integrity possible to inform us with out harming us, or his loved ones, while later in life bending to the greater ethic of the needs of the many that outweigh the needs of the few.
Just by the resonance of his voice I loved him. Kindred souls. Kindred tired souls.
By the resonance of his voice the measure of his heart was obvious.
By the resonance of his voice the extent of his empathy was felt.
By the resonance of his voice the ethic that was the man was known.
By the resonance of his voice we knew him, we loved him. What flowed from his heart and soul the words he used, the human heart that held those words, and the way he spoke them, we knew.
We knew that what he said was true. We knew that what he said was something we needed to know. We could feel his impatience with the authority that would muzzle him and make him parse his words with caution, when in truth, he had much more to tell us. It reverberated through him clear as a bell.
By the resonance of his voice we also heard the deep hope he had for us as a race when we grew up, for when we graduated from this difficult class on earth and became the people we were meant to be - when we came through this current turmoil to be born stronger, wiser and whole.
By the resonance of his voice he told us not only of the deep love he had for humanity but the unshakable certainty he had that we would prevail, but not without some work first. He made it sound almost easy by the depth of his faith in us, in humanity
By the resonance of his voice.
It is all there, go listen with your heart.
RIP Command Sargent Major Robert Orel Dean
The Future is yours.
The most important thing ever said back in the early 1900's was consciousness is the key to everything? Not just the UFO question, but E V E R Y T H I N G.
What if controlling the people of this planet was easy, until the technology for almost instantaneous communication (communion) was developed, and that the controllers realized that the population of the planet would be right back at just before that Tower of Babel Moment when they were united and realized that they could use their minds in unity to accomplish anything.
What if a plan was instituted at the turn of the century to derail this coming new unity and ability to use it to shape the planet the way we wanted to? What if the plan took every new idea about consciousness that even hinted at developing ideas of using the creative power of a mass of people to accomplish a goal and took it down, infiltrated it and made sure that it was turned into a dead end? Anything, religion, new-age, for that matter any 'movement' of thought that brought people to any kind of a unity was systematically taken apart and destroyed?
In my article about 'IMO How Schrodinger's Cat Escaped the Box" I illustrated that there exists the capacity to not only use mass mind control for good or bad, but also to shift the laws of the physical universe as we know it and that it has been proven and done. Which, in a way proves my first 'what-if' because I can't imagine why anybody would go to such great lengths for hundreds of years (probably closer the thousands of years, IMO - but we have no actual data for that) to essentially hide this fact in all strata of thought across a world population in every way it could pop up and be realized and all the work that entails if it were not true.
Just a current sampler of recent programs are, Project Mocking Bird, Hippie movement, MKULTRA, Jim Jones, Heaven's Gate, New Age, Remote Viewing, Psy Research, UFO's, Music, Religion, Academia, scientism, Big Pharma, Money. The list is practically endless. In every way possible, in everything that is connected to human interaction that looks like it might bring the planet together, has been infiltrated, controlled, manipulated to another agenda or outright destroyed.
Because this wonderful thing that is supposed to happen to the planet to bring us together - the advancement, the flash, the event, was constructed to keep us waiting for something that is already a part of who we are, by keeping us distracted and training us that we don't already have it - so that we will endlessly wait for it and above all not doing it or practicing all that stuff!! Because should we actually realize it's been there all along, their time is O-V-E-R.
Dorothy: Oh, will you help me? Can you help me?
Glinda: You don't need to be helped any longer. You've always had the power to go back to Kansas.
Dorothy: I have?
Scarecrow: Then why didn't you tell her before?
Glinda: She wouldn't have believed me. She had to learn it for herself.
Someday after mastering winds, waves, tides and gravity, we shall harness the energies of love, and then, for the second time in the history of the world, man will discover fire.
— Teilhard de Chardin1
If I could say one thing about this new book I'm reading, "Microcosm and Medium", by Joseph P. Farrell, it would be that it is a comprehensive lesson on all topics leading to an exploration of consciousness from several viewpoints such as the Mandela effect, 'Affekt' itself and how the medium of space itself can be manipulated on a gigantic scale through the manipulation of consciousness. I have blogged before about how large material systems could be used to do this, (Read 'Giza Death Star' by Farrell) but now because of the internet and almost telepathic communication - well, instantaneous communication - we can look at the other side of the uncertainty principle - or as it were, bench engineer the observer effect and make it do something to the world. I am always harping on stuff like this.
Here is where the nitty gritty work begins. Because we must be aware of the causes of our trashed world and our mind cages to be able to CHOOSE to say no. And then, we must have an enormous power of love behind it all (cohered intent) to choose not to exact revenge, but to disempower the whole thing by choosing to love the entire world and heal it, instead.
However you are called to do this is the way it should be done. There will be as many ways as there are people, once our subconscious-consensus realizes the power we have to create and heal. And we will. Because we were made that way. We were made to love and cherish all of what and whom we encounter. We were made to stand and emit waves of intelligent infinity, or love to all of creation. We were made to be creators. From <https://alsionsbells.wordpress.com/2017/02/16/the-opened-heart-plus-the-enlightened-mind/>
Because I am of the opinion that we are being used and this is being done by several groups for several purposes - some of them good and some of the nefarious.
Coherent consciousness creates order in the world. Subtle interactions link us with each other and the Earth. When human consciousness becomes coherent, the behavior of random systems may change. Random number generators (RNGs) based on quantum tunneling produce completely unpredictable sequences of zeroes and ones. But when a great event synchronizes the feelings of millions of people, our network of RNGs becomes subtly structured. We calculate one in a trillion odds that the effect is due to chance. The evidence suggests an emerging noosphere or the unifying field of consciousness described by sages in all cultures. http://noosphere.princeton.edu/
There are times when we share with others a special, fully interconnected consciousness. When great music thrills us, or we are mutually inspired by an awesome sunset, or when we fall in love, we are transported temporarily into a shared world which is remarkable. This state of true intermingling is rare, for most of us, but it is experiential, and that means we know it for what it is; we feel it immediately as real and filled with meaning. When such an experience is past and we return to our normal, separated perceptions, the experience becomes a vulnerable memory, and our educated personality may reject the consciousness that knew this deeper connection. Yet, the suspicion remains that there is something of mind that is not just inside our heads. We feel interconnected with each other and the world in a profound and important way. We know at some level that we are not isolated, but interdependent, so that a subtle energy of mine can reach out and mingle with yours, allowing us to share a moment that is important to both of us. If we think of this potential extending beyond the two of us to a world full of living beings, we have the foundation for a model for global consciousness. Maybe, as Teilhard de Chardin believed, the world ultimately needs that shared consciousness and is actively growing toward it.
The research described here points to subtle indications that we do live in an interconnected, potentially conscious world, in which we surely play an important role. We have shown immense capacities for both destructive and creative impact, and this implies that the future is ours to mold. It will be a desirable future in proportion to our level of consciousness, individually and globally. Fortunately, there are intriguing signs of an emerging integration of purpose and perspective in the world, though it remains fragile and as delicate as a newborn. For this integration to mature, we need great patience, and what we think of as good luck. Perhaps by being more conscious of the possibilities, we can lessen the need for patience and increase our portion of luck. From <http://noosphere.princeton.edu/story.html>
When I talk about things like the direct manipulation of the subconscious-consensus, think Schrodinger's Cat on steroids, a Cosmic Cat. IF you wanted to test the observer hypothesis on a large scale to see if it would change the physical medium, the constants of our universe like: the speed of light, the plank constant, the cosmological constant, or the gravitational constant, how would you do it? You would have to design an experiment that would affect large numbers of select people in designated clusters with one set of information - the manipulated set, with control groups where no information was manipulated. You would probably have to use mass media or some other way of connecting them to get out specific information. Then you would use services like the NSA server farm, GCHQ, and or the CERN servers to observe and correlate your data.
What would be the types of things you'd be looking for in your data set bbesides the constants mentioned above? You would look for weird things like:
The Man from Taured (sometimes referred to as the Taured Mystery or the Man without a Country ) is a story about a man who arrives at a Japanese airport from a country called Taured. Many people have claimed this story to be true, so the crux of the problem pertains to Taured. One would notice that there is no country by the name of Taured, either today or during the purported period of time when the incident took place, i.e. the 1950s. The story ends with the man disappearing (forever) a day after arriving in Japan. Moreover, all of his personal documents, such as his passport and driver’s license also (conveniently) disappeared, thus making this strange story unsolvable. From <https://www.ancient-origins.net/unexplained-phenomena/mysterious-tale-man-taured-evidence-parallel-universes-or-embellishment-005788>
Lerina Garcia woke up one morning and noticed minor differences. Her sheets were unfamiliar, and the pajamas she was wearing were different from the ones she'd gone to sleep in. Her day got weirder when she went to work and discovered that her office was no longer hers, and she worked in the same building, but in a different department, under a boss she'd never met. Bamboozled, she returned home, only to find that her ex-boyfriend was there — only he wasn't her ex, he was her current boyfriend. Her new lover, whom she'd been dating for months, was nowhere to be found. Lerina believes she woke here, but she's from a parallel universe where the differences are as small as her bedspread, and as significant as her love life. From <https://www.buzzfeed.com/christopherhudspeth/9-eerie-stories-of-people-who-mayve-experienced-a-parallel-d?utm_term=.ocWmYX8Qw>
I specifically remember the news report of Mandela dying in prison in the 1980's. I remember where I was while hearing those reports on TV and what time of day it was, the age of my children and feeling the world had seriously taken a turn for the worse.
Believe it or not, I started to talk to my weird friends in the 80's about feeling like I had moved sideways to another, very similar parallel universe because of the 'feel' of things' like an overall tonal effect had distinctly changed.
You would also look for previously uncorrelated things like solar effects and the earth-facing-quiet that Ben Davidson of Suspicious Observes is known for. Or the well-known in some circles solar effect on the stock market. Etc.
Looked at from a cosmological standpoint, you would also begin to speculate that your universe may have become 'porous' and where your universe abuts up against another one there may be doorways (portals) and or rips in our fabric of space time - like little hernias. And maybe at some point the nuclear detonations in the 20th century helped that process along just a bit. This basically boils down to an attempt to manipulate the fabric of space time through consciousness.
If this sounds crazy, then I suggest you look onto William A. Tiller's research, Thomas Bearden, the soviet research, Stanford University, Duke University, Princeton University, Russel Targ, Hall Puthoff, Dean Radin and others.
What could you accomplish with controlling the group (macro) observer effect of which the Mandela effect is an experimental tool? Well, if the observer effect is real and it is obvious somebody thinks it's really real, then these Mandela effect experiments are an effort to learn about it and to control it - imagine the power that would create for somebody? Also if they wanted people to never find out about this you would create CHAOS - confusion, expectancy, anger and hate, to make people hopeless and helpless - like a mass MKULTA operation in the population. We are all quite aware of that part of it, aren't we?
Then we have the science end of this approach. In 1935 Gabriel Kron proved that certain transient effects in large rotating electrical fields could be explained by higher dimensional math. He stated that every electrical field is a hybrid dimensional machine because it requires math in more than 3 dimensions to explain it. In the 19th century alone this small partial list of scientists and their work should illustrate that we are actually already engineering the physical medium and using it. We ourselves, are operating electromagnetic fields.
Einstein’s 1928 Special Relativity Paper: incorporation of the torsion tensor made the theory bench engineerable – whether the math eloquently ‘finished’ the theory or not, the equation made laboratory invention of devices to change the local energy of gravity The Kaluza -Klein Theory that unifies gravity and electromagnetism by the introduction of a new spatial dimension: time, thus uniting Einstein’s theory of gravity with Maxwell’s theory of light by introducing the fifth dimension; four dimensions of space and one dimension of time. Kaluza assumed that light is a disturbance caused by the rippling of this higher dimension.
Dr. Nikolai Kozyrev and zero point energy, dynamic torsion and its effects on the physical medium like time alteration/gravity.
Gabriel Kron’s: tensor equations for electrical machines
E.T. Whittaker: electromagnetic vortices in the space/time medium
Tesla’s: ideas on standing waves (longitudinal waves ) in the medium and that the fabric of space time acts like a fluid to solid bodies and a solid to light and heat
Lt. Col. Tom Bearden: engineering the fabric of the space time continuum is the ability to suddenly put energy into a target area and the ability to suddenly extract energy from a target area
Thomas Townsend Brown: research into odd electrical effects led him to believe he had discovered a connection between strong electric fields and gravity, a type of antigravity effect
When you add this all up it equates to: We can now do anything we like to the physical medium – space, energy, the planet, the sun, life and life force, and us – all of us – body/ /mind/emotions/spirit. So when you hear things like a ‘sun-burp’ or ascension flash – beware, be wary, be very aware: the technology exists to actually create a sun burp. It is not a thing that will happen ‘just because’. It will be created. The reason the idea exists in all surviving ancient myth folklore and ancient texts is because it has been done before. (think ancient psy-op). From <https://alsionsbells.wordpress.com/2017/11/20/out-on-a-limb-no-a-twig-practically-thin-air-here/>
What I'm getting at is that somebody very badly wants to be King of the Universe and has come at the problem of manipulating space time from every conceivable angle for a very long time. Add CERN into the equation and you have a gross manipulation of the planetary electromagnetic field which affects us and thereby spacetime and also effects the sun and the larger solar system.
The last step in all this is Tiller's studies on coherent Intension in a group working with a formally specified intension, much like old prayers, old written mantras, ritual things, where everybody says the same words with the same meaning behind them. Formally. Specified. Intension. In a positive manner, almost as a defense. (to de-fence us…)
Now whether this is right or not at this juncture of our development is a moot point, because it already exists. Being one that really does know that there are benevolent forces out there keeping an eye on this extreme game being played called earth, I am pretty sure that no grand carnage will be allowed to occur. However, just like the ancient failed machinery of the megalithic world, the ruins of which we live and breathe in, and the attempt to be sneaky about its machinery back then, we: the muggles are being used in a last ditch attempt to alter the physical medium by using the force of our minds and hearts to get us all humming in one direction and thusly creating the exact effect the somebodies who would be King want. Sneakier still, instead of using the planet they are using the life force of the planet - us.
Get Joseph Farrell's new book on Lulu and while you are waiting, listen to this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cs9f8Fpz8wU&t=53s
In relation to my last article, I ran into a video this morning of Richard Dolan giving his new lecture in Toronto, which brings this question of 'What is reality, really?' back up in my mind. Because of the way scientism crept into our culture via the new way to understand the world around us by measurement, technology has slipped into our lives creating a far more mental, cultural paradigm into our ideas of 'what-is-real'. And because this very mentally weighted cultural change to what is valuable has taken the emphasis off of human to human/ human to nature interactions we now all are immersed in a world where values are determined by a mental reality over a physical body reality. IE: you can drive right by the kids living under the bridge because your face book group is live-casting an immersive video experience of all our favorite bug selfies.
We are little bit by little bit being mentally and culturally herded into placing a higher value on the electronic mental experience over the person to person experience. It's so prevalent that jokes are made about it in social media and on TV commercials; in one way so that it is acceptable to laugh it off and in another to so inure us to the idea that we don't care, because after all, would you give your phone up? Could you? - Do you even have a land line left in your home???
Richard goes into the 'Layers of Reality', which I will list only to talk about in relation to my own ideas, then you have to watch this formidable talk he gave (1). I promise it is organized so well that even if you are very familiar with the ideas presented, it still will have you running to take notes.
These Layers of Reality are from the center of a circle out;
- the Mass pop
- the Academic pop
- the Classified Projects pop
- the Breakaway Civilization pop (top layer 'on' earth)
- ET/others pop
pop = populations and the accepted paradigm of thought / reality of each population.
Please realize - this is my interpretation of what I heard him say - IE: my reality…
IMO these layers do provide a basic stratification of understanding with which to look at a reality. The layers also provide a platform from which a control mechanism can be used to guide large numbers of people in ways to promote control over that population.
So what IS a reality? In this instance it is an understanding of an environment that allows functioning within a certain set of ideas that in some cases can actually predict and/or pre-form the actions of the people who adhere to it.
It hits my funny bone that, in the same way black projects are compartmentalized, so are stratifications of society on the planet. - On Purpose - by thought structures by the same people who control everything for well, ...control.
In one way I suppose you could say that reality is how people respond to their environment with the information they have which is controlled by the people who pump that information into different subsections of the population - therefore reality is structured out of the mind - unfortunately more than
YOUR OWN PERSONAL SENSUAL MOMENT TO MOMENT PERCEPTIONS OF THE WORLD AROUND YOU & IN YOU.
So, next idea. There is quite a contingent of people out there wrestling with the idea that we have been coerced into losing our connection with our souls (through scientism and technology) our creativity, our spiritual nature and our connection to magic - the old magic/true knowing of nature. (direct experience of the principle of life) Rudolf Steiner was one of them, a philosopher from the 19th century, Cara St. Louis is a leading current speaker on this and there are many in this school of thought who are saying that by losing this component of ourselves we lose our creative connection to source itself…
To put it in very simplistic black and white terms… the layers of constructed reality above are the devil on one shoulder and the naturalistic camp is the angel on the other shoulder - one representing right brain, the other left brain.
Now: it occurs to me that the reason the elite are really concerned right now about 'Phenomenology' is because they can't find a way to control it. IMO phenomenology is directly connected to the angels sitting on your shoulder - the camp of people who are directly advocating the inner experience of reality connected to you and your relationship to life from your very own perspective. Your own subjective perception of that 'otherness' in life that is uniquely your own. The elite are trying to tell you HOW to feel about it, but they cannot control that experience with information they put out about it - they can only form how you FEEL about it and how you judge it.
As Grant Cameron has been telling us lately, the direct UFO experience is very related to this and how well you are connected to your creative right-brained self. He has written a book about well-known musicians and the point of the book is that they all, to the very last one, have had 'contact' experiences.
More to follow in this as I muddle through thinking about it, but I think it is very interesting this connection to reality-forming through technology and media is being used to try to (what seems like) herd us mentally away from the state of mind that is more grounded in true self-perception which leads straight into the state of mind that is the epicenter of all phenomenological experiences.
This is beginning to look like another
"Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!",
"Nothing to see here.",
psy-op the more dots that come together. So, that means we are on the right track!!!
1.) “The Cost of Secrecy: From Money To Mind Control" at the Alien Cosmic Expo in Toronto, June 23, 2018. From <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=py6c909gzMQ&t=2442s>
The human heart can go the lengths of God…
Dark and cold we may be, but this
Is no winter now. The frozen misery
Of centuries breaks, cracks, begins to move;
The thunder is the thunder of the floes,
The thaw, the flood, the upstart Spring.
Thank God our time is now when wrong
Comes up to face us everywhere,
Never to leave us till we take
The longest stride of soul we ever took.
Affairs are now soul size.
Is exploration into God.
Where are you making for? It takes
So many thousand years to wake,
But will you wake for pity’s sake!
How would we know that one person's perception is any different than our own? We assume that because others are not acting strangely that they are seeing/perceiving what we are. And that they are feeling - which is their own inner reaction to the perception - the same as we are especially if those feelings appear to be the same, IE: everybody is crying, everybody is laughing.
But what if life is just slightly off in a couple of important ways? For you? What if you are born knowing pretty closely what people are thinking, or at least their motives behind what they are saying to you and what if you always know when they are lying…etc., etc., etc.? What if you thought everybody had this information? The question would then become; Why on earth are they saying this to me when we both know they are not being truthful? How crazy-making would that be? The only conclusion you could draw as a kid is that big people like to be mean and they are all as tricky as hell.
As you grew up you would understand that you had to see behind the mask/lie that everybody projected for various reasons. You would also understand that there were times when as long as they were polite, you just really couldn't give a rat's ass anymore with most of them. Then once you close that door because of the racket it brought your mind, you would begin to loose true perception which would make you an excellent mark. Especially once you decided to try to see the 'good' in everybody because you were tired of the ugliness…
In pursuit of a structure to understand this grand mess, you begin to think about things like; walking a mile in another's shoes, what that I am perceiving is my own perception and what is someone else's? With my body's senses, what am I feeling, and does it correlate to my direct environment - or not? With my feelings, are they making sense to my inner self and the moment, or are they foreign? With my mind am I alone in there or do I have company? Trust me, these are not the usual questions most people ask themselves. They are questions one asks when one is trying to check out whether they are crazy or not… and they make you feel crazy - but they are actually questions a very sane person would ask, once they begin to piece together that they really are different from what they are told they are and what they think they are and what they are allowed to be.
It wasn't until I took a course called, Integrated Awareness taught by an amazing woman named Connie Newton that I was really able to make some sense of it, and trust me, I had tried because at the point I found her class, I had been reading the Bailey books, was a card carrying member the Theosophical Society in America in Geneva IL and attended classes there, had been doing yoga for some 7+ years, and had some martial arts training under my belt, had attended chi class, had read Ledbetter, was drawing aura's and had been into UFO's for years.
KNOW that there will be NO accidents from this point on. At this point in your ascension process everything that happens in your life is YOUR creation. Because your consciousness is now resonating to the threshold to the fifth dimension, every random thought and emotion will become manifest. Because you still hold a physical form, your manifestations will still appear to be bound by time…your 3D brain, which has been limping along at 3-5% efficiency…your multidimensional consciousness will no longer accept the obvious lies and illusions that were “normal” for your third dimensional consciousness
Her class was about using an energy bridge that created a white light within the pineal/pituitary bodies of the brain, which helped me a lot. I not only got a handle on what was going on with myself, but was able to bring under my conscious control the rogue behavior of the extended senses or sensitivity that I had been plagued by all my life. When I was a little kid, I would lay in bed trying to go to sleep and every night I would see beautiful fireworks in my head, so much so that I couldn't fall asleep. This bridge brought them under my control too.
I began to understand that everybody had their own internal symbolic structure inside their head. This structure had similarities and personal symbology, much like Jung's theory of architypes. There are idea structures in the large picture that we all have like, parent, sibling, family etc. that are the same in meaning, the only difference being how we react to those structures causing a difference in personal experience and memories. IE; if you like the color blue, then it has a positive connotation to you, but if you hate it…
Fast forward to the last month or so; my dad who recently passed has come twice to me in the between (sleep and waking). The first time was to express amazement and joy, the second time he had that look like he was seeing something he'd never seen before, and it was serious and squinty eyed, like he was trying to see into me… he wasn't mad, it wasn't disapproval, but it was a look my dad never gave me before (I guess I should cut him some slack, he's never been dead before either…at least in this current personality). I'm not sure what he meant this last time.
This all started me thinking about perception and the act of perception. For most of our lives we use our body - the 3D anchor - to perceive, gather and use information in this world. When we talk about other places not of this world, we talk about them in 3D terms - it is, after all, our only experience in this form we wear - or so we think. So, does the body create perception, or is it just the perceptive instrument? If it's just the instrument you use to perceive this place, then how do we as spirits/beings actually interact with people or this 3D world after we no longer wear a body? Is it through a thought construct of the memory of being in a body? Because, I will swear to the truth of contact with dead people who are not in the body…and other beings who might not even have a body…(and, I AM NOT CRAZY, jus' say'in)
Next thought on this is that, it shouldn't really matter the condition of the body that perceives (except for a condition creating a distraction through pain, etc.) however, even though the body and the perceiver are intertwined as one, they are still also separate, so the perceiver should be able to know and perceive, even though the body is not perfect IE: Steven Hawking, and anyone who remote views.
I also wonder if the internet of things is not the entire false paradigm that we are all worried about? Is that internal world called the internet which lives almost entirely in our minds any more or less 'real' than the 3D world? The answer will come to me one day when I see the internet changing something in the 'real world' without real-world action. Like ordering my grass cut on line and looking out my window at a perfect lawn from one second to the next. That would be when I knew something was up.
As much as they like to fool us, as much as they might wish to so seamlessly meld the on-line world with the 3D world, there is always going to be something more real about planting my bare feet in the grass and talking to my trees, feeling the love of my pets and hearing them in my mind, feeling the stomach ache my husband has in my own stomach, and knowing that interaction is with living things in real-time-in-my-face, instead of a sophisticated piece of machinery I'm holding in my hand that is only feeding my mind. The day this internet learns to invade my body at the level of 3D to create a false perception, is the day it will already be too late to stop the invasion. Till then, I'm good even if I am now being annoyed by ads for the S9+ Samsung phone…
(which until I can get
[PAY ATTENTION GOOGLE, OR WHOEVER YOU ARE!!!]
a glass-pad phone with heads up holographic display and interactive holographic keyboard - at a freaking real price I can afford - it's all MEH)
I guess the question really is,
who are we?
I know this whole opening into a better world belongs to our children and the future.
Disclosure and all, and I mean all, that it is about has finally reached a ground swell, has finally gotten enough momentum to continue. There are finally enough of us out there who know the truth - that even if 'the-they' tried to confuse the issue one more time as Grant Cameron has pointed out that they have about every 20 years in his book 'Managing Magic' the-they would be entirely unsuccessful.
This feels like Christmas morning as a kid before you open the presents to me. I have, since I was very little, known I wanted this to happen with all my heart. Being little I had no idea how it would happen, but I had a fierce longing in my heart for it, even before 'it' became a fully formed idea in my mind. I was born in 1953. I charged into all-about-UFO's at a very, very young age. By the time I was 13, I had been chasing this idea of ET's not even knowing I was doing it for 10 years and as I grew up so the idea got more sophisticated in my heart and soul. I seriously KNEW there was life out there and I wanted to meet them and know them. I thought Star Trek was the best thing ever to happen on TV, because it portrayed life out there in a balanced more sane way than ever before. I wanted to be Vulcan because when I figured out what telepathy was, I wanted it and at the time I didn't realize it, but I had already had a first contact experience that was telepathic and continued to have them throughout my life. Might I say, the people who I knew then had the highest ethic of compassion and love, of contact only to the extent that the psyche of the person could tolerate reasonably and they NEVER went past my internal boundaries - not once - even when I didn't know what a boundary was! I cut my eye teeth on Adamski and Menger. I ate up every publication I could find - even science fiction, information was always serendipitously appearing for me to read, and I was a card carrying member of NICAP for a while.
I kept hoping through the years in my heart of hearts - all through grade school and high school and after, that we would wake up. It was all obvious to me and I wished everybody knew too. I got married at 18 had my first child 8 years later my second 2 years later and it wasn't until the mid-80's when I could finally get my head out of the sand and re-look at the UFO issue.
By that time, of course, people were laughing at the 50's contactees and everybody was into 'serious' research on nuts and bolts. The movie "the Three Faces of Eve" had come out in 1957 and then was remade at for TV as a miniseries called 'Sybil' in 1976. Both of these movies, IMO were CIA propaganda the frighten the hell out of people who were beginning to have contact with ET's telepathically so that no one would ever open their mouths. They painted a horrifying picture of brokenness, that, IMO, might even have been concocted from information gleaned from MKUltra experiments. So even if you were at that time receiving telepathic communications, or downloads - even if you masked it in spiritualism, you were looked upon as a truly sick and fractured person.
Meanwhile, I was into yoga, mysticism and was a card carrying member of the Theosophical Society in Wheaton IL at 18yrs old - still looking for a way to open my mind. Well, marriage, 2 kids, divorce and remarriage and launching of 20 somethings later, I finally, truly had the time to pursue this issue with the intensity I wanted to. When I retired in 2007 I had found Kerry Cassidy, then I found a dear soul, Kosta Makreas who literally set me on the course that has me writing these blogs, and not long after that Jimmy Church. I missed all the falderal from 1980 to 2007 and when I dipped my toes back into my passion, I was 'given' Kerry Cassidy to learn from, and the dominoes fell.
Today, the heart dreams I had as a very small child are coming to fruition, the ground swell is so great, we have people like David Wilcock, Corey Goode and Emery Smith presenting information that I know in my heart of hearts is VERY real (did they read my mind?) and "The Truth is Out There" quite literally, for all to see. Then we have the youngsters out there with huge talent Like Adrian Vallera, who has taken the true jist of the 60's hippie movement sans the drugs and sex (because I see the manifesto of the Space Brothers as a direct transfer into the hippie movement of the 60's) and is beginning to manifest it on a large, brilliant scale to reach as many souls as his team can.
I have watched for 63 years and I have kept my dreams of my heart to myself for 63 years, what I thought I would never see hit the light of day, is illuminated. We will make it, and it is the youngsters who will see to it we do.
…and in my heart, it is Christmas morning.
Bottom line, if you have 2 counter rotating electromagnetic fields in close proximity you can control time and reality.
It's only a matter of placement and harmonics. The question becomes, at what level do you want that control? On a consciousness level or a physical matter level? Will you know how to control it to get the results you want - can you bench engineer it? Repeat it? Scale it? Therein the consideration of the electrical power/potential of the field becomes the issue. IE: the Die Glocke ripped holes in the fabric of space time the same as the atom bomb - power…
Allegedly an experiment carried out by Third Reich scientists working for the SS in a German facility known as Der Riese ("The Giant") near the Wenceslaus mine and close to the Czech border, Die Glocke is described as being a device "made out of a hard, heavy metal" approximately 2.7 metres (9 ft) wide and 3.7 to 4.6 metres (12 to 15 ft) high, having a shape similar to that of a large bell. According to an interview of Witkowski by Cook, this device ostensibly contained two counter-rotating cylinders which would be "filled with a mercury-like substance, violet in color". This metallic liquid was code-named "Xerum 525" and was "stored in a tall thin thermos flask a meter high encased in lead". Additional substances said to be employed in the experiments, referred to as Leichtmetall (light metal), "included thorium and beryllium peroxides". Witkowski describes Die Glocke, when activated, as having an effect zone extending out 150 to 200 metres (490 to 660 ft). Within the zone, crystals would form in animal tissue, blood would gel & separate while plants would decompose into a grease like substance. Witkowski also said that five of the seven original scientists working on the project died in the course of the tests. Based upon certain external indications, Witkowski states that the ruins of a concrete framework, aesthetically dubbed "The Henge", in the vicinity of the Wenceslas mine (50°37′43″N 16°29′40″E), some 3.1 kilometres (1.9 mi) southeast of the main Complex Sokolec underground works of Project Riese, may have once served as a test rig for an experiment in "anti-gravity propulsion" generated with Die Glocke. However, the derelict structure itself has also been interpreted to resemble the remains of a conventional industrial cooling tower.
Witkowski’s statements along with Cook’s views prompted further conjecture about the device from various American authors, including Joseph P. Farrell, Jim Marrs, and Henry Stevens. In his book, Hitler's Suppressed and Still-Secret Weapons, Science and Technology (2007), Stevens concludes that the violet mercury-like substance described by Witkowski could only be red mercury because normal mercury "has no fluid compounds according to conventional wisdom". Stevens presents a story attributed to German scientist Otto Cerny as told to then 13-year-old Greg Rowe around 1961 which alleged that a concave mirror on top of a device which seemed similar in description to Die Glocke provided the ability to see "images from the past" during its operation. From <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Die_Glocke>
From Joseph P Farrell: The Philosopher's Stone: Alchemy and the Secret Research for Exotic Matter
Before proceeding to outline a speculative case of what the mysterious IRR Xerum 525 might have been composed of, and what its use in the Bell was designed to do, a brief review of the Bell itself — its construction, operation, effects, and scientific rationalizations for them — is in order. Briefly stated, its construction, operation, and effects, are these:
1. While the size of the Bell’s dimensions vary according to which sources one consults, the standard size may safely be said to be from 12–15 feet tall, and 9–12 feet wide;486
2. It was cylindrical and bell-shaped in appearance, hence its codename among the Germans, die Glocke, the Bell;487
3. Its outer shell was composed of some type of ceramic or metallic material;488
4. It was cryogenically cooled by liquid nitrogen or oxygen;489
5. Around its outside there were several ports for high-voltage electrical cabling, a fact that indicates that the Bell could be transported to various sites for testing and “plugged in.” Additionally, the Bell made a buzzing-hissing sound when in operation, a fact that led to its nickname among the Germans, die Bienenstock, the Beehive;490
6. Inside the device were two counter-rotating drums capable of being spun at extremely high velocities;491
a. Witkowski has argued that these drums were nested one inside the other, as in a typical plasma focus device;492
b. I have previously argued that another possible arrangement was one on top of the other;493
7. The top of the device had some sort of hook-like attachment, indicating that it could perhaps be suspended from a balance scale or similar device;494
8. In the central core of the Bell was a stationary shaft, into which a “thermos bottle” containing the Serum 525 was placed;495
9. Mercury and possibly the Serum 525 itself were placed on the surfaces of the rotating cylinders;496
10.The Bell gave off extremely toxic, and in some cases lethal, field effects to a distance of some 150-200 meters from the device when in operation.497Accordingly, a variety of organic materials and life forms were tested in its presence. Among its many effects, the following two are of noteworthy significance:
a. In the case of plants, exposure to its field resulted in the cellular breakdown of plants within hours to weeks, with the plants decaying suddenly and finally to a state of a brown-grayish goo;498
b. In the case of humans, its first tests resulted in the deaths of five of the seven scientists involved. While subsequent tests appear to have mitigated these effects, people exposed to its field reported the sensation of “pins and needles” on their skin, of sleeplessness, and a persisting metallic taste in the mouth;499
c. the Bell’s above-ground test-rig, the so-called Henge structure at Ludwigsdorff, shows signs of exposure to heavy ionized and neutron radiation. Additionally, the structure’s steel reinforcement bolts running around the top of the structure appear to have been sheared or broken off by some abrupt and powerful force;500
d. the Bell also exploded light bulbs and created damage in electrical equipment in the surrounding environs during its tests above ground;501
11. In the case of outdoor tests conducted at night, some concentration camp workers associated with the project report seeing “barrel-like” devices ascending above the tree-lines with a pale blue glow;502
12. The Bell was tested under the most extreme security around the environs of Ludwigsdorff and Castle Fürstenstein in the mountains of Lower Silesia;503
13. Approximately sixty of the scientists and technicians connected with the project were murdered by the SS prior to the end of the war, and the device, and all its project documentation, along with General Kammler and a massive six-engine Junkers 390 heavy lift ultra-long-range aircraft went missing at the end of the war;504
14. Its scientific head, Prof. Dr. Walther Gerlach, was one of the interred scientists at Farm Hall, who was heard talking mysteriously of magnetic fields separation, vortex compression, the gravitation of the earth’s magnetic field, and so on. Additionally, Dr. Gerlach was the only one of the Farm Hall scientists subsequently taken to the United States for further interrogation. Upon his return to Germany, he never wrote again of gravitation or spin resonance and other subjects that had been his specialty before the war.505
15. One of the Bell’s project scientists, and the designer of its power plant, the electrical engineer Dr. Kurt Debus, subsequently ended up as a senior flight director during the NASA Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo space projects at Cape Canaveral;506
16. A mathematician from the University of Königsberg, Dr. Elizabeth Adler, was brought in as a consultant during the project, for reasons never disclosed in the currently extant evidence concerning the project;507
17. The Bell’s code names, Das Laternenträgerprojekt, The Lantern-bearer Project, and Projekt Kronos, Project Time, or alternatively, Project Saturn, are evocative of an esoteric and occult influence possibly at work in the background of the project, since “lantern-bearer” or “light-bearer” is a loose conceptual relationship to Lucifer, the light-bearer, and “Kronos” is the Greek word both for time and for the planet Saturn. Thus, the code name Projekt Kronos could suggest a project having to do both with the manipulation of time, and with some field propulsion experiment designed to give lead to access to distant planets, symbolized by Saturn.508 Finally, there is also a reference to the Bell project also being code-named Tor or “Gate” at some point in the literature.509
(emphasis mine and the footnotes not included - buy the book…)
Farrell, Joseph P.. The Philosopher's Stone: Alchemy and the Secret Research for Exotic Matter (p. 286). Feral House. Kindle Edition.
In my book Secrets of the Unified Field, I explored at some length the cogent arguments of Bell researcher Igor Witkowski that the counter-rotating drums within the device had been laid out in the form of a typical plasma focus, one inside the other. Indeed, Witkowski’s arguments are compelling, and rationalize the device quite well.510 As outlined in Secrets of the Unified Field, however, a case can be argued that the Nazis may have rationalized the device along the lines of the incorporation of some form of torsion tensor in the unified field theories that began to be published in the Weimar Republic between the wars and before the Nazi assumption of power. There I argued that the presence of a mathematician from the University of Königsberg — the same university that saw the development of the first such hyper-dimensional unified field theory, that of mathematician Dr. Theodor Kaluza — within the Bell project pointed to a modified form of Kaluza’s theory, that included torsion, as the basis of the project. Additionally, that theory’s “geometry” was cylindrical.511 Since one of the effects of torsion is similar to wringing an empty soda can like a dishrag, producing spiraling folds and pleats in the fabric of spacetime similar to the spiraling folds and pleats in the can that result from its “wringing,” I speculated that in order to maximize this torsion effect within the Bell, that the counter-rotating drums were analogous to this image: the drums, in other words, could equally be rationalized to have been placed one on top of the other, in order to maximize the torsion effect produced by the device.
Farrell, Joseph P.. The Philosopher's Stone: Alchemy and the Secret Research for Exotic Matter (p. 287). Feral House. Kindle Edition.
Macro to Micro
Your brain creates an electromagnetic field and so does your heart....
Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD; also magneto-fluid dynamics or hydromagnetics) is the study of the magnetic properties of electrically conducting fluids. Examples of such magnetofluids include plasmas, liquid metals, salt water, and electrolytes.
( we as human are mostly salt water…)
The word "magnetohydrodynamics" is derived from magneto- meaning magnetic field, hydro- meaning water, and dynamics meaning movement. The field of MHD was initiated by Hannes Alfvén, for which he received the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1970.
There is a small matter of synchronization and spin…
What if right brain function spins one way and left brain function spins the other…-
What if you either quiet or convince the brain to maintain a right-brain creative spin and use the powerful field of the heart, synchronize them and create a portal - like one where your body could follow your spirit/mind/energy aspect right through?
What would constitute markers of electromagnetic spin in either direction in a heart - type of emotion or a state of feeling the emotion, or none at all - a state of quiet? In the 'magic of words, I don’t think it's any accident that emotion = e-motion, or energy in motion…
Could synchronization between mind and heart happen with intent? Or, simple observation?
When a quantum "observer" is watching Quantum mechanics states that particles can also behave as waves. This can be true for electrons at the submicron level, i.e., at distances measuring less than one micron, or one thousandth of a millimeter. When behaving as waves, they can simultaneously pass through several openings in a barrier and then meet again at the other side of the barrier. This "meeting" is known as interference.
Strange as it may sound, interference can only occur when no one is watching. Once an observer begins to watch the particles going through the openings, the picture changes dramatically: if a particle can be seen going through one opening, then it's clear it didn't go through another. In other words, when under observation, electrons are being "forced" to behave like particles and not like waves. Thus the mere act of observation affects the experimental findings.
Could the concentration of a psychopathic brain and a black heart - be as effective as a focused creative mind and a powerfully loving heart…. ? It would explain quite a lot to me. It would also make the case for science instead of magic.
There is a simple switch in the brain - a simple truth. (of that I'm certain! ) When we discover it, it will be magical, but in truth, just science at different level. There are old true-isms and legends and writings, monolith's, hieroglyphs, languages with mysteries encoded in their very shape, all around us with these keys blatantly displayed if only we knew how to read them.
IE: This is vortex science - spin, described by the ancient Hebrew written language.
For thousands of years, spiritual teachers of the Jewish and Christian traditions have claimed that the Hebrew alphabet is composed of "holy" letters of special significance and superhuman origin. With the recent publication of Michael Drosnin's book The Bible Code, the release of Jodie Foster's film Contact and Fred Alan Wolfe's work on The Spiritual Universe, attention is fixed on the potential fusion of science and religion. (better word would have been spirituality - emphasis is mine) A perfect time for Stan Tenen, a physicist and Director of the Meru Foundation, to take the stage.
By fusing mathematics and Jewish mysticism, Tenen has demonstrated that the first verse of Genesis in the Hebrew Bible generates a mathematical Torus. When a particular portion is removed from this 'doughnut', its shape mirrors the human hand.
Tenen claims the Hebrew alphabet is based on the human hand, because it represents the function of differentiating self from other, inside from outside. "The alphabet links the inner world of the mind with the outer world of experience, just as our hands do," he says. "And," he continues, "The first letter of the book of Genesis -Bet- means 'house', something that distinguishes inside from outside; this is the most basic distinction you can make at any level of consciousness."
When Tenen broke the first word of Genesis into its 'subatomic particles' (the word is actually comprised of two smaller words, meaning "fire" and "six-edged thorn"), he took the "thorn" to mean a tetrahedron and constructed a model of it, placing the "fire," or torus "vortex" form, inside. Tenen noticed that the model, which he calls "The Light In the Meeting Tent" also reflected the polarity of perfect symmetry (the tetrahedron) and asymmetry (the vortex form). As he studied it, he discovered it was even more multifaceted than he had realized. "When I looked through the faces of the tetrahedron at the vortex, each view displayed a different letter in the Hebrew alphabet," he says. And," he mentions almost casually," I realized the 27 gestures that accompany the letters correspond to the 27 'preferred' pointing directions used in hyper-dimensional space. From <http://www.meru.org/Press/Atlantisrising.html>
Thus we get the Egyptian hieroglyph with 3 contexts: sound (a representation of the sound you hear, like our letters), Word (single word meaning – like tree, or cat), Quantum Concept ( metaphor – like a representation). From <https://alsionsbells.wordpress.com/2016/11/23/its-all-in-the-language-hiero-phant-glyph-archy-ocrasy-divide-and-conquer/>
Throughout the entire electromagnetic spectrum - there is a matching 3D analogue/concept for all the frequencies - that gives us right-out, the matching harmonious resonance for us to see and use.
It's all about the harmonies…
The point is that if by analogy we can scale this information up and down, just like the Em-field, there should be a point in there where we can see it working in the human body-mind-spirit complex. For instance Mind and Heart two electromagnetic tori (toruses) with their single meeting point, at the throat chakra, whose color I might add is blue, synchronized spinning at that point, which is the same as 'the pinch', the Zp (zero point), where the correctly spoken word is made into sound (another ELF frequency band) may actually do something, or change something, actually have some effect in the outer world…
It's a beginning, thinking this way by analogy and cross disciplinarily, and it's totally abhorrent to science, but - why not bench engineer this stuff and instead apply the scientific method to new ideas and make them repeatable, scalable and useful?